Amborella v. duckweed: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Syntenic relationship== | ==Syntenic relationship== | ||
[[Amborella]] does not have any structural evidence for a whole genome duplication event. | [[Amborella]] does not have any structural evidence for a whole genome duplication event. As such, it genome structure is representative of the unduplicated genome of all angiosperms. Duckweed has evidence of at least [[Duckweed v. Duckweed | one whole genome duplication event]]. Comparison to Ambroella provides evidence that this is either two sequential tetraploidy events or a single hexaploidy event. | ||
[[File:Screen Shot 2012-03-21 at 6.35.17 PM.png|thumb|center|800px|Ambroella (x-axis) v. Duckweed (y-axis) with synonymous mutation rates colored for syntenic gene pairs. Results may be regenerated: http://genomevolution.org/r/4mtp]] | [[File:Screen Shot 2012-03-21 at 6.35.17 PM.png|thumb|center|800px|Ambroella (x-axis) v. Duckweed (y-axis) with synonymous mutation rates colored for syntenic gene pairs. Results may be regenerated: http://genomevolution.org/r/4mtp]] | ||
Latest revision as of 20:42, 22 September 2015
Syntenic relationship
Amborella does not have any structural evidence for a whole genome duplication event. As such, it genome structure is representative of the unduplicated genome of all angiosperms. Duckweed has evidence of at least one whole genome duplication event. Comparison to Ambroella provides evidence that this is either two sequential tetraploidy events or a single hexaploidy event.
