Evidence for pre-angiosperm WGD: Difference between revisions

From CoGepedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
← Older editNewer edit →
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
===Region2===
===Region2===
[[File:Screen shot 2012-05-09 at 4.05.39 PM.png|center|800px|thumb|Ambo-grape-ambo (http://genomevolution.org/r/4s1u).  Interesting. . . while genes are definitely not in order in Ambo, coverage/fractionation to grape is enticing.]]
[[File:Screen shot 2012-05-09 at 4.05.39 PM.png|center|800px|thumb|Ambo-grape-ambo (http://genomevolution.org/r/4s1u).  Interesting. . . while genes are definitely not in order in Ambo, coverage/fractionation to grape is enticing.]]
===Region3===
[[File:Screen shot 2012-05-09 at 4.39.15 PM.png|center|800px|thumb|Ambo-ambo (http://genomevolution.org/r/4s2w0)]]

Revision as of 23:40, 9 May 2012

Region1

Ambo-grape-ambo (http://genomevolution.org/r/4s1n). One ambo region (top) has a weak syntenic signal to grape which consists of 3 collinear genes. However, there is a density of putative homologous gene pairs which may infer synteny.
Ambo-grape-ambo (http://genomevolution.org/r/4s1o). Expanded view of the above region. This gives a feeling for general "noise" from non-syntenic gene-pair matches. The three collinear genes definitely have the "feeling" of being real.

Region2

Ambo-grape-ambo (http://genomevolution.org/r/4s1u). Interesting. . . while genes are definitely not in order in Ambo, coverage/fractionation to grape is enticing.

Region3

Ambo-ambo (http://genomevolution.org/r/4s2w0)
Retrieved from "https://genomevolution.org/wiki/index.php?title=Evidence_for_pre-angiosperm_WGD&oldid=4836"