Amborella: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
==Amborella gene models are okay== | ==Amborella gene models are okay== | ||
[[Image:Screen shot 2012-01-22 at 5.04.30 PM.png|thumb|left| | [[Image:Screen shot 2012-01-22 at 5.04.30 PM.png|thumb|left|600px|[[GEvo]] analysis of annotated Ambroella v. three syntenic grape regions (derived from the [[paleohexaploidy]]). Analysis can be regenerated at: http://genomevolution.org/r/4f4o]] | ||
==No evidence of synteny with Selaginella== | |||
[[File:Master 16737 1636.CDS-CDS.lastz.dag.all.go D20 g10 A5.aligncoords.gcoords ct0.w1000.s.sr.cs1.csoS.png|thumb|left|400px|SynMap: Amborella (x-axis) v. Selaginella (y-axis). No evidence of syntenic. http://genomevolution.org/r/4f56]] | |||
Revision as of 00:39, 23 January 2012
Objective: This page is to track information related to the analysis of the Amborella genome.=
Amborella lacks the eudicot paleohexaploidy
Amborella gene models are okay
No evidence of synteny with Selaginella
