Genlisea intragenomic analyses: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 22:56, 20 February 2012 view source Elyons (talk \| contribs) Bureaucrats, Administrators 4,473 edits Created page with '[[File:Screen shot 2012-02-20 at 3.55.26 PM.png\|thumb\|600px\|center\|Genlisea regions are NOT intercalated. Slight intercalation might be due to a transposon-like sequence. http:/...'		Revision as of 12:18, 22 February 2012 view source Elyons (talk \| contribs) Bureaucrats, Administrators 4,473 edits No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
	[[File:Screen shot 2012-02-20 at 3.55.26 PM.png\|thumb\|~~600px~~\|center\|Genlisea regions are NOT intercalated. Slight intercalation might be due to a transposon-like sequence. http://genomevolution.org/r/4j88]]		[[File:Screen shot 2012-02-22 at 4.58.00 AM.png\|thumb\|800px\|center\|GEvo analysis of syntenic regions of Genlisea (2x) and tomato (1x center). Note that the syntenic genes of Genlisea are intercalated with respect to tomato, but there NO genes are syntenic or homeologously shared between the Genlisea regions. This is strong evidence that Genlisea has a subsequent whole genome duplication followed by extensive fractionation.]]
			[[File:Screen shot 2012-02-20 at 3.55.26 PM.png\|thumb\|800px\|center\|Genlisea regions are NOT intercalated. Slight intercalation might be due to a transposon-like sequence. http://genomevolution.org/r/4j88]]

Revision as of 12:18, 22 February 2012