Duckweed v. Duckweed: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
[[File:Screen Shot 2012-03-21 at 7.30.19 PM.png|thumb|800px|center|Syntenic dotplot of self-self with Duckweed. Minimum of 3 genes to call a region syntenic. Results may be regenerated at: http://genomevolution.org/r/4mut]] | [[File:Screen Shot 2012-03-21 at 7.30.19 PM.png|thumb|800px|center|Syntenic dotplot of self-self with Duckweed. Minimum of 3 genes to call a region syntenic. Note: synonymous mutation rate calculations are highly suspect due to the high-GC content of this genome. Results may be regenerated at: http://genomevolution.org/r/4mut]] | ||
[[File:Screen Shot 2012-03-21 at 7.41.21 PM.png|thumb|800px|center|[[GEvo]] analysis of 4x duckweed. Only three regions appear to be syntenic with one another. 4th region (top panel) hs many hits, but those hits are not collinear. Evidence that Duckweed is a hexaploidy. Results may be regenerated at: http://genomevolution.org/r/4mv4]] | [[File:Screen Shot 2012-03-21 at 7.41.21 PM.png|thumb|800px|center|[[GEvo]] analysis of 4x duckweed. Only three regions appear to be syntenic with one another. 4th region (top panel) hs many hits, but those hits are not collinear. Evidence that Duckweed is a hexaploidy. Results may be regenerated at: http://genomevolution.org/r/4mv4]] | ||
Revision as of 02:48, 22 March 2012
