Evidence for pre-angiosperm WGD: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
===Region1=== | ===Region1=== | ||
[[File:Screen shot 2012-05-09 at 3.52.36 PM.png|center|800px|thumb|Ambo-grape-ambo (http://genomevolution.org/r/4s1n). One ambo region (top) has a weak syntenic signal to grape which consists of 3 collinear genes. However, there is a density of putative homologous gene pairs which may infer synteny.]] | [[File:Screen shot 2012-05-09 at 3.52.36 PM.png|center|800px|thumb|Ambo-grape-ambo (http://genomevolution.org/r/4s1n). One ambo region (top) has a weak syntenic signal to grape which consists of 3 collinear genes. However, there is a density of putative homologous gene pairs which may infer synteny.]] | ||
| Line 5: | Line 4: | ||
===Region2=== | ===Region2=== | ||
[[File:Screen shot 2012-05-09 at 4.05.39 PM.png|center|800px|thumb|Ambo-grape-ambo (http://genomevolution.org/r/4s1u). Interesting. . . while genes are definitely not in order in Ambo, coverage/fractionation to grape is enticing. | [[File:Screen shot 2012-05-09 at 4.05.39 PM.png|center|800px|thumb|Ambo-grape-ambo (http://genomevolution.org/r/4s1u). Interesting. . . while genes are definitely not in order in Ambo, coverage/fractionation to grape is enticing.]] | ||
Revision as of 23:07, 9 May 2012
Region1
Region2
