Difference between revisions of "Evidence for pre-angiosperm WGD"
From CoGepedia
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
===Region2=== | ===Region2=== | ||
[[File:Screen shot 2012-05-09 at 4.05.39 PM.png|center|800px|thumb|Ambo-grape-ambo (http://genomevolution.org/r/4s1u). Interesting. . . while genes are definitely not in order in Ambo, coverage/fractionation to grape is enticing.]] | [[File:Screen shot 2012-05-09 at 4.05.39 PM.png|center|800px|thumb|Ambo-grape-ambo (http://genomevolution.org/r/4s1u). Interesting. . . while genes are definitely not in order in Ambo, coverage/fractionation to grape is enticing.]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===Region3=== | ||
| + | [[File:Screen shot 2012-05-09 at 4.39.15 PM.png|center|800px|thumb|Ambo-ambo (http://genomevolution.org/r/4s2w0)]] | ||
Revision as of 17:40, 9 May 2012
Region1
Ambo-grape-ambo (http://genomevolution.org/r/4s1n). One ambo region (top) has a weak syntenic signal to grape which consists of 3 collinear genes. However, there is a density of putative homologous gene pairs which may infer synteny.
Ambo-grape-ambo (http://genomevolution.org/r/4s1o). Expanded view of the above region. This gives a feeling for general "noise" from non-syntenic gene-pair matches. The three collinear genes definitely have the "feeling" of being real.
Region2
Ambo-grape-ambo (http://genomevolution.org/r/4s1u). Interesting. . . while genes are definitely not in order in Ambo, coverage/fractionation to grape is enticing.
Region3
Ambo-ambo (http://genomevolution.org/r/4s2w0)
